<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47201</link>
    <description>The Court held that the petitioners must pay the additional duty under the Custom Tariff Act for imported marble materials, despite the non-leviability of excise duty on similar products. The Court emphasized that the exemption from basic customs duty did not extend to the additional duty, and there was no legal basis for the petitioners to claim exemption. The petition was dismissed, and a stay of operation was granted for three weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47201</link>
      <description>The Court held that the petitioners must pay the additional duty under the Custom Tariff Act for imported marble materials, despite the non-leviability of excise duty on similar products. The Court emphasized that the exemption from basic customs duty did not extend to the additional duty, and there was no legal basis for the petitioners to claim exemption. The petition was dismissed, and a stay of operation was granted for three weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>