<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 431 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779635</link>
    <description>ITAT, Pune (AT) restored the appeal to the file of the CIT(A)/NFAC, directing condonation of a 151-day delay and remand for decision on merits after affording the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The Tribunal held that substantial justice should prevail over technical delay and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, instructing the lower authority to decide the matter on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 18:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 431 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779635</link>
      <description>ITAT, Pune (AT) restored the appeal to the file of the CIT(A)/NFAC, directing condonation of a 151-day delay and remand for decision on merits after affording the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The Tribunal held that substantial justice should prevail over technical delay and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, instructing the lower authority to decide the matter on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>