<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 437 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779641</link>
    <description>Madras HC ordered the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks from the date of uploading the web copy of the order; the impugned Order-in-Original dated 25.02.2025 was quashed and the petition disposed. The dispute arose from alleged short payment of IGST, excess or ineligible ITC not reflected in GSTR-2A, reversals under Rules 42/43, interest under s.50, blocked ITC under s.17(5) and late fee under s.47; petitioner agreed to the 25% deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 08:54:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 437 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779641</link>
      <description>Madras HC ordered the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks from the date of uploading the web copy of the order; the impugned Order-in-Original dated 25.02.2025 was quashed and the petition disposed. The dispute arose from alleged short payment of IGST, excess or ineligible ITC not reflected in GSTR-2A, reversals under Rules 42/43, interest under s.50, blocked ITC under s.17(5) and late fee under s.47; petitioner agreed to the 25% deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>