<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1624 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464161</link>
    <description>Under the procurement rules, only non-material bid deficiencies may be waived, clarified or rectified, while defects that alter the substance of the bid remain incurable. A shortfall in supporting documents such as audited accounts, turnover, working capital and income-tax records was treated as a curable non-material non-conformity because it did not change the bid&#039;s substance or competitive position. By contrast, a financial undertaking that reserved performance security at 2.5% and omitted the tender-linked obligation under the amended rules was held to be a material deviation affecting substantive contractual obligations. The clarification power was discretionary and could not convert a non-responsive bid into a responsive one.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 21:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1624 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464161</link>
      <description>Under the procurement rules, only non-material bid deficiencies may be waived, clarified or rectified, while defects that alter the substance of the bid remain incurable. A shortfall in supporting documents such as audited accounts, turnover, working capital and income-tax records was treated as a curable non-material non-conformity because it did not change the bid&#039;s substance or competitive position. By contrast, a financial undertaking that reserved performance security at 2.5% and omitted the tender-linked obligation under the amended rules was held to be a material deviation affecting substantive contractual obligations. The clarification power was discretionary and could not convert a non-responsive bid into a responsive one.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>