<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1636 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464164</link>
    <description>Patna HC dismissed the regular bail petition and refused reconsideration of an earlier detailed order, holding the petitioner failed the twin-test required to lift the statutory bar under Section 45 of PMLA as mandated by the Supreme Court. The court found no grounds to revisit its prior decision, observing that incarceration alone does not justify reconsideration of bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 21:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1636 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464164</link>
      <description>Patna HC dismissed the regular bail petition and refused reconsideration of an earlier detailed order, holding the petitioner failed the twin-test required to lift the statutory bar under Section 45 of PMLA as mandated by the Supreme Court. The court found no grounds to revisit its prior decision, observing that incarceration alone does not justify reconsideration of bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>