<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1726 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464166</link>
    <description>Parity in bail can justify enlargement where the accused&#039;s attributed role is comparable to that of a co-accused already on bail. The Court compared the appellant&#039;s alleged role in the counter affidavit with the co-accused&#039;s role and found them similarly situated for bail purposes. On that basis, the appellant was entitled to bail on the same terms and conditions, and was directed to be released after completion of bail formalities before the Special Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 18:15:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1726 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464166</link>
      <description>Parity in bail can justify enlargement where the accused&#039;s attributed role is comparable to that of a co-accused already on bail. The Court compared the appellant&#039;s alleged role in the counter affidavit with the co-accused&#039;s role and found them similarly situated for bail purposes. On that basis, the appellant was entitled to bail on the same terms and conditions, and was directed to be released after completion of bail formalities before the Special Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>