<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1708 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464174</link>
    <description>Notice under s.143(2) left unsigned and blank was held violative of s.282A(1) and therefore invalid and void ab initio; relying on SC precedent that a valid s.143(2) notice is sine qua non for framing assessment and on HC authority confirming mandatory issuance in reassessment, the Tribunal held that, once the s.143(2) notice is invalid, the AO lacks jurisdiction to complete assessment under s.143(3); the assessment was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 21:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1708 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464174</link>
      <description>Notice under s.143(2) left unsigned and blank was held violative of s.282A(1) and therefore invalid and void ab initio; relying on SC precedent that a valid s.143(2) notice is sine qua non for framing assessment and on HC authority confirming mandatory issuance in reassessment, the Tribunal held that, once the s.143(2) notice is invalid, the AO lacks jurisdiction to complete assessment under s.143(3); the assessment was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>