<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1318 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464175</link>
    <description>Where reopening of assessment is sanctioned under the wrong clause of section 151, the sanction is invalid and the reassessment notice founded on it cannot survive. The Bombay HC applied its earlier view that a notice issued on defective sanction is unsustainable, and an assessment order based on that notice must also fall. On that reasoning, the impugned notices, assessment order and consequential assessment-related orders were quashed and set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 21:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=857138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1318 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464175</link>
      <description>Where reopening of assessment is sanctioned under the wrong clause of section 151, the sanction is invalid and the reassessment notice founded on it cannot survive. The Bombay HC applied its earlier view that a notice issued on defective sanction is unsustainable, and an assessment order based on that notice must also fall. On that reasoning, the impugned notices, assessment order and consequential assessment-related orders were quashed and set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>