https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47190 The court upheld the Commissioner's order confirming duty amounts against the petitioner-company, including interest and penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Penalties on individuals associated with the company were also affirmed. The court denied urgent orders to use attached materials and restrain actions, emphasizing the pending stay applications before the CESTAT and the imminent hearing. It stressed the importance of pursuing legal remedies through appropriate channels, leaving the decision on material use and production work to the relevant authority. en-us Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:12:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47190 The court upheld the Commissioner's order confirming duty amounts against the petitioner-company, including interest and penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Penalties on individuals associated with the company were also affirmed. The court denied urgent orders to use attached materials and restrain actions, emphasizing the pending stay applications before the CESTAT and the imminent hearing. It stressed the importance of pursuing legal remedies through appropriate channels, leaving the decision on material use and production work to the relevant authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47190