https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779585 ITAT held that additions under s. 69A relating to unexplained cash deposits could not be sustained. The AO had not rejected books nor produced evidence of sales or purchases outside records, and no proof of SBN deposits was shown. Given consistent turnover and absence of corroborative evidence, the tribunal directed deletion of the remaining addition and allowed the taxpayer's appeal. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:48:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779585 ITAT held that additions under s. 69A relating to unexplained cash deposits could not be sustained. The AO had not rejected books nor produced evidence of sales or purchases outside records, and no proof of SBN deposits was shown. Given consistent turnover and absence of corroborative evidence, the tribunal directed deletion of the remaining addition and allowed the taxpayer's appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779585