https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779586 ITAT (Raipur) held that additions under s. 69A read with s. 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits were unsustainable at that stage because the assessee had sought and the counsel promised to furnish evidence substantiating the source. In the interest of substantive justice the tribunal set aside the CIT(A)/NFAC order and remanded the matter for de novo adjudication on merits, directing fresh consideration of the claimed evidence and sources in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:48:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779586 ITAT (Raipur) held that additions under s. 69A read with s. 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits were unsustainable at that stage because the assessee had sought and the counsel promised to furnish evidence substantiating the source. In the interest of substantive justice the tribunal set aside the CIT(A)/NFAC order and remanded the matter for de novo adjudication on merits, directing fresh consideration of the claimed evidence and sources in accordance with law. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779586