<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779558</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the appellate authority&#039;s deletion of an income-tax addition, agreeing that the assessing officer&#039;s finding-that a company was a conduit providing accommodation entries-was not supported by the facts. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)&#039;s thorough fact-based analysis and relied on precedent to reject criticism of lower authorities&#039; reasoning. The decision restores the deletion of undisclosed income and is decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 14:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 354 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779558</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the appellate authority&#039;s deletion of an income-tax addition, agreeing that the assessing officer&#039;s finding-that a company was a conduit providing accommodation entries-was not supported by the facts. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)&#039;s thorough fact-based analysis and relied on precedent to reject criticism of lower authorities&#039; reasoning. The decision restores the deletion of undisclosed income and is decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>