<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 355 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779559</link>
    <description>ITAT, Delhi (AT) upheld the appellate order dismissing the Revenue&#039;s addition under s.68. The Tribunal found the assessee showed consistent annual sales growth and substantial stock movement, discrepancies in only October did not prove undisclosed cash sources. AO made the addition without properly verifying or rejecting books of account; CIT(A)&#039;s detailed, speaking order was sustained. Consequently the addition was deleted and the Revenue&#039;s grounds were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:45:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 355 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779559</link>
      <description>ITAT, Delhi (AT) upheld the appellate order dismissing the Revenue&#039;s addition under s.68. The Tribunal found the assessee showed consistent annual sales growth and substantial stock movement, discrepancies in only October did not prove undisclosed cash sources. AO made the addition without properly verifying or rejecting books of account; CIT(A)&#039;s detailed, speaking order was sustained. Consequently the addition was deleted and the Revenue&#039;s grounds were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>