https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779561 ITAT MUMBAI - AT held that CIT(A) erred in treating the assessment as ex parte and incorrectly restoring the matter to the AO; instead CIT(A) should have adjudicated the transfer-pricing issue on merits. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and directed CIT(A) to decide the TP issue afresh on merits, ensuring the assessee is given an opportunity of being heard. The assessee's appeal is allowed. en-us Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2025 10:02:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779561 ITAT MUMBAI - AT held that CIT(A) erred in treating the assessment as ex parte and incorrectly restoring the matter to the AO; instead CIT(A) should have adjudicated the transfer-pricing issue on merits. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and directed CIT(A) to decide the TP issue afresh on merits, ensuring the assessee is given an opportunity of being heard. The assessee's appeal is allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779561