<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 359 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779563</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revision under s.263 and upheld the ITAT&#039;s finding for the assessee that interest earned on fixed deposits, created from funds brought by non-resident investors for a real estate project, was connected with the business/project and thus not merely income from other sources. The Court agreed there was adequate enquiry into nexus between the deposits and the project, and no interference was warranted; no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:45:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 359 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779563</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revision under s.263 and upheld the ITAT&#039;s finding for the assessee that interest earned on fixed deposits, created from funds brought by non-resident investors for a real estate project, was connected with the business/project and thus not merely income from other sources. The Court agreed there was adequate enquiry into nexus between the deposits and the project, and no interference was warranted; no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>