<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 368 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779572</link>
    <description>HC quashed the impugned assessment order and remitted the matter to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication. The court noted the assessee failed to respond to the SCN and hearings. Remand is conditional: the assessee must deposit an additional 15% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash/credit ledger within 30 days, over and above the 10% already pre-deposited on appeal. Petition disposed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 368 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779572</link>
      <description>HC quashed the impugned assessment order and remitted the matter to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication. The court noted the assessee failed to respond to the SCN and hearings. Remand is conditional: the assessee must deposit an additional 15% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash/credit ledger within 30 days, over and above the 10% already pre-deposited on appeal. Petition disposed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>