https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779574 A debarment order could not be sustained where the petitioner had already been given an opportunity to correct GST registration particulars and had submitted the corrected documents. Once the rectified GST materials were accepted, the respondent was required to assess the candidature on that basis and could not continue relying on the earlier incorrect certificate to deny enlistment. The earlier defective filing had already been addressed in prior proceedings, so it could not be used again as a continuing disqualification after rectification. The debarment order was therefore set aside, and the respondent was directed to consider enlistment on the basis of the corrected documents alone. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:45:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779574 A debarment order could not be sustained where the petitioner had already been given an opportunity to correct GST registration particulars and had submitted the corrected documents. Once the rectified GST materials were accepted, the respondent was required to assess the candidature on that basis and could not continue relying on the earlier incorrect certificate to deny enlistment. The earlier defective filing had already been addressed in prior proceedings, so it could not be used again as a continuing disqualification after rectification. The debarment order was therefore set aside, and the respondent was directed to consider enlistment on the basis of the corrected documents alone. Case-Laws GST Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779574