<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 375 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779579</link>
    <description>An assessment order under GST Section 73 was challenged in writ jurisdiction on the basis of defect No. 10 and other objections. The High Court interfered only to the limited extent of defect No. 10, quashed that part of the demand, and remitted the matter for a fresh de novo decision by the authority. For the remaining issues, the court declined writ adjudication and left the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 375 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779579</link>
      <description>An assessment order under GST Section 73 was challenged in writ jurisdiction on the basis of defect No. 10 and other objections. The High Court interfered only to the limited extent of defect No. 10, quashed that part of the demand, and remitted the matter for a fresh de novo decision by the authority. For the remaining issues, the court declined writ adjudication and left the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>