https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779580 A rectification rejection order was held invalid because it gave only a bare conclusion, stated that the reply had been considered, and relied on an earlier order without disclosing reasons. Such a non-speaking disposal was treated as arbitrary and inconsistent with natural justice, particularly the requirement of a fair hearing. The order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits after giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:45:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779580 A rectification rejection order was held invalid because it gave only a bare conclusion, stated that the reply had been considered, and relied on an earlier order without disclosing reasons. Such a non-speaking disposal was treated as arbitrary and inconsistent with natural justice, particularly the requirement of a fair hearing. The order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits after giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. Case-Laws GST Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779580