<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47174</link>
    <description>The SC ruled against the revenue, holding that although the appellant had availed Modvat/Cenvat credit and was alleged to owe Rs. 6,10,580, the excise duty paid subsequently matched the credit availed. Because payment of excise duty after claiming the Modvat credit rendered the transaction revenue neutral, the revenue&#039;s claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47174</link>
      <description>The SC ruled against the revenue, holding that although the appellant had availed Modvat/Cenvat credit and was alleged to owe Rs. 6,10,580, the excise duty paid subsequently matched the credit availed. Because payment of excise duty after claiming the Modvat credit rendered the transaction revenue neutral, the revenue&#039;s claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>