<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 379 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779583</link>
    <description>The writ petition was declined because a statutory appeal and rectification remedy were available, so the High Court did not entertain the writ jurisdiction. The petition was disposed of with a direction that the pending rectification application be decided by the prescribed date after hearing the petitioner, preserving the statutory process as the proper forum for relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 08:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 379 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779583</link>
      <description>The writ petition was declined because a statutory appeal and rectification remedy were available, so the High Court did not entertain the writ jurisdiction. The petition was disposed of with a direction that the pending rectification application be decided by the prescribed date after hearing the petitioner, preserving the statutory process as the proper forum for relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>