https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464140 The HC dismissed the review petition, finding no error in the CESTAT's determination that input services used in providing output services - including services for setting up a New Technology Centre - did not warrant interference. The court upheld the earlier findings and concluded there was no basis to disturb the order dated December 1, 2022, thus rejecting the challenge to the treatment of such services under the applicable notification amendments. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2025 22:03:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464140 The HC dismissed the review petition, finding no error in the CESTAT's determination that input services used in providing output services - including services for setting up a New Technology Centre - did not warrant interference. The court upheld the earlier findings and concluded there was no basis to disturb the order dated December 1, 2022, thus rejecting the challenge to the treatment of such services under the applicable notification amendments. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464140