<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 2079 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464146</link>
    <description>SC considered valuation of imported goods where the importer suppressed facts and misdeclared MRP; earlier relied case law by the Commissioner(Appeals) was found inapplicable. CESTAT had observed no dispute over description, classification or quantity and noted the appellant had declared RSP. The Court directed issuance of notice on the application for condonation of delay and on the appeal, permitting the matter to proceed for adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 22:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 2079 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464146</link>
      <description>SC considered valuation of imported goods where the importer suppressed facts and misdeclared MRP; earlier relied case law by the Commissioner(Appeals) was found inapplicable. CESTAT had observed no dispute over description, classification or quantity and noted the appellant had declared RSP. The Court directed issuance of notice on the application for condonation of delay and on the appeal, permitting the matter to proceed for adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>