<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47171</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the Division Bench&#039;s decision in favor of the petitioners, directing the Central Excise Authorities to refund the deposited amount. Despite no specific order for interest, the court held the respondents liable to pay simple interest at 8% per annum from July 10, 2002, to March 5, 2004, due to delayed refund processing. The court considered this period reasonable for refund completion. The respondents were ordered to pay the interest within one month, with no additional costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:10:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47171</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the Division Bench&#039;s decision in favor of the petitioners, directing the Central Excise Authorities to refund the deposited amount. Despite no specific order for interest, the court held the respondents liable to pay simple interest at 8% per annum from July 10, 2002, to March 5, 2004, due to delayed refund processing. The court considered this period reasonable for refund completion. The respondents were ordered to pay the interest within one month, with no additional costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>