<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1905 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464152</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition and refused bail. The court upheld the HC&#039;s order denying the second bail application under CGST ss.132(1)(c) and 132(1)(i), finding no grounds to interfere. The petitioner&#039;s prior conduct-having sought and then not complied with the HC order dated 02.01.2023 in the earlier bail proceedings-weighed against relief, so the HC dismissal of the second bail plea was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 22:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1905 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464152</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition and refused bail. The court upheld the HC&#039;s order denying the second bail application under CGST ss.132(1)(c) and 132(1)(i), finding no grounds to interfere. The petitioner&#039;s prior conduct-having sought and then not complied with the HC order dated 02.01.2023 in the earlier bail proceedings-weighed against relief, so the HC dismissal of the second bail plea was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>