https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47163 Pre-execution challenges to detention orders are not entertained as a matter of course; interference is confined to recognised exceptional grounds, and a petitioner cannot compel disclosure of detention grounds merely on assertion that they resemble another case. The Court also treated suppression of an earlier petition before another High Court, together with inconsistent jurisdictional claims and residence assertions, as fatal to discretionary writ relief. On those facts, the writ petition was declined in extraordinary jurisdiction, while leaving the petitioner free, if surrendered, to pursue remedies available in law against the detention order. en-us Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:48:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47163 Pre-execution challenges to detention orders are not entertained as a matter of course; interference is confined to recognised exceptional grounds, and a petitioner cannot compel disclosure of detention grounds merely on assertion that they resemble another case. The Court also treated suppression of an earlier petition before another High Court, together with inconsistent jurisdictional claims and residence assertions, as fatal to discretionary writ relief. On those facts, the writ petition was declined in extraordinary jurisdiction, while leaving the petitioner free, if surrendered, to pursue remedies available in law against the detention order. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47163