<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47160</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the circular dated 7-9-2001, ruling that cutting or slitting steel sheets does not constitute manufacture since no new product emerges. It further held that revenue legislation cannot be introduced via administrative circulars, as taxation is a legislative function. The writ petitions were allowed, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47160</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the circular dated 7-9-2001, ruling that cutting or slitting steel sheets does not constitute manufacture since no new product emerges. It further held that revenue legislation cannot be introduced via administrative circulars, as taxation is a legislative function. The writ petitions were allowed, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>