<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 211 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464134</link>
    <description>The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay was treated as a &quot;local authority&quot; within section 3(26) of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904, because that definition expressly includes a &quot;body of port trustees&quot;. On that construction, no further inquiry into general attributes such as autonomy was required. In the alternative, the Board was held to control and manage a local fund under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, since it could levy rates, credit receipts to the port&#039;s general account, and apply those funds for statutory purposes. The Central Government&#039;s supervisory control did not negate that statutory control. The premises were therefore exempt from the Bombay Rent Act under section 4.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 12:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 211 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464134</link>
      <description>The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay was treated as a &quot;local authority&quot; within section 3(26) of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904, because that definition expressly includes a &quot;body of port trustees&quot;. On that construction, no further inquiry into general attributes such as autonomy was required. In the alternative, the Board was held to control and manage a local fund under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, since it could levy rates, credit receipts to the port&#039;s general account, and apply those funds for statutory purposes. The Central Government&#039;s supervisory control did not negate that statutory control. The premises were therefore exempt from the Bombay Rent Act under section 4.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>