https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464132 Section 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 provides only a summary and optional remedy for compensation after a temporary injunction is wrongly obtained, and it does not bar an independent civil suit for damages. On the facts, the defendants had no independent right in the godown, the injunction was obtained after possession had been delivered, and the plaintiffs were prevented from using the premises; the Court treated the absence of a separate pleading of malice as non-prejudicial in context and sustained damages for wrongful use and occupation. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2025 11:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464132 Section 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 provides only a summary and optional remedy for compensation after a temporary injunction is wrongly obtained, and it does not bar an independent civil suit for damages. On the facts, the defendants had no independent right in the godown, the injunction was obtained after possession had been delivered, and the plaintiffs were prevented from using the premises; the Court treated the absence of a separate pleading of malice as non-prejudicial in context and sustained damages for wrongful use and occupation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464132