<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 75 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47154</link>
    <description>Transferable Duty Entitlement Pass Book credit under the Export Import Policy was held to be &quot;goods&quot; for sales tax purposes because it was movable property with independent market value and commercial utility. The court reasoned that the credit was neither money, as it was not a circulating medium of exchange, nor an actionable claim, because it was a crystallised and immediately transferable entitlement usable against import duty without legal enforcement. Even if treated as a debt-like right, it remained assignable property. The credit therefore fell within Section 2(13) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and was liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 75 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47154</link>
      <description>Transferable Duty Entitlement Pass Book credit under the Export Import Policy was held to be &quot;goods&quot; for sales tax purposes because it was movable property with independent market value and commercial utility. The court reasoned that the credit was neither money, as it was not a circulating medium of exchange, nor an actionable claim, because it was a crystallised and immediately transferable entitlement usable against import duty without legal enforcement. Even if treated as a debt-like right, it remained assignable property. The credit therefore fell within Section 2(13) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and was liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>