<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>25% disallowance of purchases upheld for unverified bogus suppliers; matter remitted for verification; Rs 12L loan deletion</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93135</link>
    <description>ITAT upholds a 25% disallowance of purchases from a particular supplier after finding the assessee had admitted bogus purchases earlier and failed to discharge the onus to prove genuineness in the impugned year; documents produced were insufficient and veracity could not be verified as the assessee prevented examination of suppliers. ITAT also holds that the first appellate authority erred in appreciating unverified late-filed evidence without affording the AO an opportunity to verify same, observed a breach of natural justice, and restores the related disallowance issue to the file of the AO for verification of all evidences. Separately, the tribunal allows the assessee&#039;s ground and deletes an addition of Rs. 12 lakh unsecured loan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>25% disallowance of purchases upheld for unverified bogus suppliers; matter remitted for verification; Rs 12L loan deletion</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93135</link>
      <description>ITAT upholds a 25% disallowance of purchases from a particular supplier after finding the assessee had admitted bogus purchases earlier and failed to discharge the onus to prove genuineness in the impugned year; documents produced were insufficient and veracity could not be verified as the assessee prevented examination of suppliers. ITAT also holds that the first appellate authority erred in appreciating unverified late-filed evidence without affording the AO an opportunity to verify same, observed a breach of natural justice, and restores the related disallowance issue to the file of the AO for verification of all evidences. Separately, the tribunal allows the assessee&#039;s ground and deletes an addition of Rs. 12 lakh unsecured loan.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>