<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal dismissed: four properties attached as proceeds of crime under PMLA; two direct, two equivalent-value acquisitions upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93127</link>
    <description>The AT dismissed the appeal, upholding attachment of four properties as &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; under PMLA. It declined to re-evaluate investigative evidence because the appellant and co-accused face trial for the predicate offence and ED lacks power to re-investigate the scheduled offence. Two properties purchased in 2011 were held to be directly acquired from criminal proceeds; two earlier acquisitions were held attachable under the second limb of &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; as equivalent value where proceeds were siphoned off and unavailable. The AT applied binding higher-court precedent interpreting the statutory definition and concluded attachment of equivalent value was lawful, thereby rejecting the appellant&#039;s grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal dismissed: four properties attached as proceeds of crime under PMLA; two direct, two equivalent-value acquisitions upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93127</link>
      <description>The AT dismissed the appeal, upholding attachment of four properties as &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; under PMLA. It declined to re-evaluate investigative evidence because the appellant and co-accused face trial for the predicate offence and ED lacks power to re-investigate the scheduled offence. Two properties purchased in 2011 were held to be directly acquired from criminal proceeds; two earlier acquisitions were held attachable under the second limb of &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; as equivalent value where proceeds were siphoned off and unavailable. The AT applied binding higher-court precedent interpreting the statutory definition and concluded attachment of equivalent value was lawful, thereby rejecting the appellant&#039;s grounds.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>