<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 260 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779464</link>
    <description>CESTAT held the impugned levy of service tax on fees collected by the police under the head &quot;security agency&quot; is unsustainable. Relying on prior Tribunal and SC rulings, it found police activities do not fall within the definition of &quot;security agency&quot; under the Finance Act, and the fees are statutory charges deposited into government treasury per CBEC guidance, not taxable service receipts. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 260 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779464</link>
      <description>CESTAT held the impugned levy of service tax on fees collected by the police under the head &quot;security agency&quot; is unsustainable. Relying on prior Tribunal and SC rulings, it found police activities do not fall within the definition of &quot;security agency&quot; under the Finance Act, and the fees are statutory charges deposited into government treasury per CBEC guidance, not taxable service receipts. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>