https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779471 The dispute concerns whether deputation of employees by overseas entities to the petitioner during April 2008 to March 2013 was taxable as employer-agreement or supply agency service, or as a service under the post-1 July 2012 regime, and whether the extended limitation period could be used for recovery. The Supreme Court condoned delay, issued notice returnable in four weeks, and permitted dasti service. en-us Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779471 The dispute concerns whether deputation of employees by overseas entities to the petitioner during April 2008 to March 2013 was taxable as employer-agreement or supply agency service, or as a service under the post-1 July 2012 regime, and whether the extended limitation period could be used for recovery. The Supreme Court condoned delay, issued notice returnable in four weeks, and permitted dasti service. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779471