<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 268 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, AT NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779472</link>
    <description>AT dismissed the appeal. The tribunal upheld attachment of four properties in a money-laundering case: two acquired during the period of the predicate fraud were treated as proceeds of crime, and the other two-though purchased earlier-were attached as equivalent value under the second limb of &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; because the illicit funds had been siphoned and layered through group companies. The tribunal declined to reappraise trial-stage evidence or allow ED to re-investigate the predicate offence, noting the accused are facing trial, and found no merit in the appellant&#039;s challenges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 14:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 268 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, AT NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779472</link>
      <description>AT dismissed the appeal. The tribunal upheld attachment of four properties in a money-laundering case: two acquired during the period of the predicate fraud were treated as proceeds of crime, and the other two-though purchased earlier-were attached as equivalent value under the second limb of &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; because the illicit funds had been siphoned and layered through group companies. The tribunal declined to reappraise trial-stage evidence or allow ED to re-investigate the predicate offence, noting the accused are facing trial, and found no merit in the appellant&#039;s challenges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>