<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 272 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779476</link>
    <description>Prolonged incarceration, read with the surrounding facts, justified interference with the impugned order and grant of bail. The appellant had remained in custody for more than four years, and the record also noted reversal of the properties, while anticipatory bail had earlier been granted and later cancelled for breach of conditions. On that factual matrix, the order was set aside and bail was granted subject to terms and conditions to be imposed by the Trial Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 272 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779476</link>
      <description>Prolonged incarceration, read with the surrounding facts, justified interference with the impugned order and grant of bail. The appellant had remained in custody for more than four years, and the record also noted reversal of the properties, while anticipatory bail had earlier been granted and later cancelled for breach of conditions. On that factual matrix, the order was set aside and bail was granted subject to terms and conditions to be imposed by the Trial Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>