https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779477 SC refused bail prima facie to the petitioner, holding that further investigation cannot proceed unless co-accused are taken into custody and that granting bail would impede inquiry. The Court held Section 66(2) PMLA is distinct and mandates sharing materials with other agencies; parallel FIRs and charge sheets may proceed independently. Two state FIRs were upheld as based on distinct materials and witnesses. Petitioners were granted liberty to move for regular or anticipatory bail, to be decided on merits uninfluenced by prior orders. Special Leave Petition dismissed. en-us Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779477 SC refused bail prima facie to the petitioner, holding that further investigation cannot proceed unless co-accused are taken into custody and that granting bail would impede inquiry. The Court held Section 66(2) PMLA is distinct and mandates sharing materials with other agencies; parallel FIRs and charge sheets may proceed independently. Two state FIRs were upheld as based on distinct materials and witnesses. Petitioners were granted liberty to move for regular or anticipatory bail, to be decided on merits uninfluenced by prior orders. Special Leave Petition dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779477