https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779479 NCLAT held the government notification channeling beach sand mineral exports through a designated canalising agent did not bar foreign trade but required routing via the agent; it ruled Section 4 (abuse of dominant position) inapplicable and that "enterprise" excludes sovereign government activities such as atomic energy. The Tribunal upheld CCI's closure of the information under Section 26(2) as the notification raised policy issues outside CCI's remit, dismissed the appeals, and noted the appellants may seek remedy through appropriate fora. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2025 13:05:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779479 NCLAT held the government notification channeling beach sand mineral exports through a designated canalising agent did not bar foreign trade but required routing via the agent; it ruled Section 4 (abuse of dominant position) inapplicable and that "enterprise" excludes sovereign government activities such as atomic energy. The Tribunal upheld CCI's closure of the information under Section 26(2) as the notification raised policy issues outside CCI's remit, dismissed the appeals, and noted the appellants may seek remedy through appropriate fora. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779479