https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779484 Bank account attachment was treated as inoperative because it had been stated to operate only for six months and no extension order was shown. On that basis, the court found the grievance regarding the petitioners' bank accounts to have been worked out and directed the banks not to continue the attachment. Relief in relation to the bank account attachment was therefore granted, while the petition was otherwise disposed of with liberty on the unresolved provisional-release issue. en-us Mon, 29 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779484 Bank account attachment was treated as inoperative because it had been stated to operate only for six months and no extension order was shown. On that basis, the court found the grievance regarding the petitioners' bank accounts to have been worked out and directed the banks not to continue the attachment. Relief in relation to the bank account attachment was therefore granted, while the petition was otherwise disposed of with liberty on the unresolved provisional-release issue. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 29 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779484