<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 287 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779491</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLKATA upheld CIT(A)&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s product, described as distilled organic inedible fatty acid, falls within Excise Chapter 38 (industrial monocarboxylic/long-chain fatty acids) and not the excluded items of Chapter XIII, entitling the assessee to deduction under section 80IC. The Departmental Representative failed to rebut the factual classification. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 287 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779491</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLKATA upheld CIT(A)&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s product, described as distilled organic inedible fatty acid, falls within Excise Chapter 38 (industrial monocarboxylic/long-chain fatty acids) and not the excluded items of Chapter XIII, entitling the assessee to deduction under section 80IC. The Departmental Representative failed to rebut the factual classification. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>