<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 302 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779506</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the trust did not violate sec.13(1)(c) read with sec.13(2)(f)/13(3) as the trustee paid the full consideration (Rs.1.67,50,000) for trust property in tranches, with balance paid before rectification, evidencing market-price sale. Tribunal found CIT(A) erred in sustaining denial of exemption under sec.11. ITAT directed the AO to grant sec.11 exemption to the trust and compute its income accordingly, decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 302 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779506</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the trust did not violate sec.13(1)(c) read with sec.13(2)(f)/13(3) as the trustee paid the full consideration (Rs.1.67,50,000) for trust property in tranches, with balance paid before rectification, evidencing market-price sale. Tribunal found CIT(A) erred in sustaining denial of exemption under sec.11. ITAT directed the AO to grant sec.11 exemption to the trust and compute its income accordingly, decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>