<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 306 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779510</link>
    <description>ITAT (Del-AT) held that disallowance under s.43B for VAT, GST and similar levies not paid before the return-filing due date was not permissible where those amounts were neither debited to the profit-and-loss account nor claimed as deductions by the taxpayer. The Tribunal found AO, CPC and CIT(A) erred in treating the amounts as claimed deductions under s.43B, directed deletion of the s.43B disallowance in respect of VAT/GST, and decided the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 306 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779510</link>
      <description>ITAT (Del-AT) held that disallowance under s.43B for VAT, GST and similar levies not paid before the return-filing due date was not permissible where those amounts were neither debited to the profit-and-loss account nor claimed as deductions by the taxpayer. The Tribunal found AO, CPC and CIT(A) erred in treating the amounts as claimed deductions under s.43B, directed deletion of the s.43B disallowance in respect of VAT/GST, and decided the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>