<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 308 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779512</link>
    <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of deduction under s.80IA(4) for generation of power for captive consumption, endorsing calculation of deduction using the market rate of electricity (benchmarked to state board/open market rates) in line with the SC&#039;s precedent. HC also sustained the Tribunal&#039;s partial disallowance of interest under s.14A read with s.36(1)(iii) (Rs.91.80 lakh) where assessee&#039;s own funds exceeded the investment and borrowed funds were not shown to fund dividend-earning investments. The Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of a Rs.5 lakh compromise on other administrative expenses was likewise upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 308 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779512</link>
      <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of deduction under s.80IA(4) for generation of power for captive consumption, endorsing calculation of deduction using the market rate of electricity (benchmarked to state board/open market rates) in line with the SC&#039;s precedent. HC also sustained the Tribunal&#039;s partial disallowance of interest under s.14A read with s.36(1)(iii) (Rs.91.80 lakh) where assessee&#039;s own funds exceeded the investment and borrowed funds were not shown to fund dividend-earning investments. The Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of a Rs.5 lakh compromise on other administrative expenses was likewise upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>