<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 309 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779513</link>
    <description>HC held that the ex-parte proceedings arose from the petitioner&#039;s non-participation attributable to noncommunication by the petitioner&#039;s chartered accountant; the AO could not locate the emailed notice. Noting identical precedent, the court granted the petitioner one opportunity to appear before respondent No. 3 and to file a reply to the Section 148B notice, directing fresh participation rather than upholding the ex-parte disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 309 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779513</link>
      <description>HC held that the ex-parte proceedings arose from the petitioner&#039;s non-participation attributable to noncommunication by the petitioner&#039;s chartered accountant; the AO could not locate the emailed notice. Noting identical precedent, the court granted the petitioner one opportunity to appear before respondent No. 3 and to file a reply to the Section 148B notice, directing fresh participation rather than upholding the ex-parte disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>