<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 316 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779520</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and disposed of any interlocutory applications, refusing to interfere with the HC&#039;s order rejecting condonation of delay to file a revised return. The Court noted the HC had earlier directed the respondent to decide related applications within eight weeks and that the petitioner failed to challenge that order. Given an inordinate delay of nearly five years from the impugned order, SC declined relief and affirmed the High Court&#039;s judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 316 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779520</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and disposed of any interlocutory applications, refusing to interfere with the HC&#039;s order rejecting condonation of delay to file a revised return. The Court noted the HC had earlier directed the respondent to decide related applications within eight weeks and that the petitioner failed to challenge that order. Given an inordinate delay of nearly five years from the impugned order, SC declined relief and affirmed the High Court&#039;s judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>