https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464112 Anticipatory bail was justified where the dispute stemmed from commercial agreements between two construction companies and the allegations were founded mainly on documentary material. The Court found the controversy to be essentially one of breach of contract and recovery of money, with disputed rights and obligations capable of examination in civil proceedings. As bank documents had already been collected during investigation, custodial interrogation for recovery of money or documents was not shown to be necessary. Protection from arrest was therefore granted. en-us Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2025 20:17:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464112 Anticipatory bail was justified where the dispute stemmed from commercial agreements between two construction companies and the allegations were founded mainly on documentary material. The Court found the controversy to be essentially one of breach of contract and recovery of money, with disputed rights and obligations capable of examination in civil proceedings. As bank documents had already been collected during investigation, custodial interrogation for recovery of money or documents was not shown to be necessary. Protection from arrest was therefore granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464112