<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1651 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464115</link>
    <description>Regular bail was declined where the accused breached express bail conditions by selling immovable properties already under attachment and then failing to appear before the trial court. The record showed prior knowledge of the attachment, service of notices to vacate, and references to the attached properties in proceedings challenging the attachment order, making the plea of ignorance or illiteracy untenable. His non-appearance led to non-bailable warrants and declaration as a proclaimed offender. On these facts, the Court treated the conduct as deliberate non-compliance with bail terms and evasion of the trial process, so regular bail was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 20:17:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1651 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464115</link>
      <description>Regular bail was declined where the accused breached express bail conditions by selling immovable properties already under attachment and then failing to appear before the trial court. The record showed prior knowledge of the attachment, service of notices to vacate, and references to the attached properties in proceedings challenging the attachment order, making the plea of ignorance or illiteracy untenable. His non-appearance led to non-bailable warrants and declaration as a proclaimed offender. On these facts, the Court treated the conduct as deliberate non-compliance with bail terms and evasion of the trial process, so regular bail was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>