<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Set aside order rejecting appeal as time-barred for 23 days; remit for fresh adjudication under Rule 108(3)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93115</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the appeal as time-barred by 23 days and remitted the matter to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication within a reasonable time. The court found the appellate authority erred in adopting a hyper-technical approach where the appellant, owing to bona fide confusion and portal/upload irregularities (including non-upload of the order summary and issuance of appeal number on physical filing), could not be deemed to have wilfully delayed filing; medical infirmity of the appellant was noted. The HC directed the appellate authority to entertain the appeal in accordance with Rule 108(3) provisos and applicable law and to decide afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Set aside order rejecting appeal as time-barred for 23 days; remit for fresh adjudication under Rule 108(3)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93115</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the appeal as time-barred by 23 days and remitted the matter to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication within a reasonable time. The court found the appellate authority erred in adopting a hyper-technical approach where the appellant, owing to bona fide confusion and portal/upload irregularities (including non-upload of the order summary and issuance of appeal number on physical filing), could not be deemed to have wilfully delayed filing; medical infirmity of the appellant was noted. The HC directed the appellate authority to entertain the appeal in accordance with Rule 108(3) provisos and applicable law and to decide afresh.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>