<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47129</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Customs Department&#039;s jurisdiction to issue notices and conduct investigations under Section 108 of the Customs Act, despite prior adjudication by the licensing authority. The court dismissed the writ appeals, validating the notices and ongoing investigations, emphasizing the Customs Department&#039;s authority to probe potential smuggling activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47129</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Customs Department&#039;s jurisdiction to issue notices and conduct investigations under Section 108 of the Customs Act, despite prior adjudication by the licensing authority. The court dismissed the writ appeals, validating the notices and ongoing investigations, emphasizing the Customs Department&#039;s authority to probe potential smuggling activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>