<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 175 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779379</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that Rule 8 and Rule 10A(iii) of the Valuation Rules do not apply where job-worked finished goods are sold to or returned and consumed by the principal manufacturer. The tribunal found the appellant did not captively consume the goods nor were they consumed on its behalf by the principal, so valuation under Rule 8/10A(iii) was inappropriate. The duty demands based on those rules were set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 175 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779379</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that Rule 8 and Rule 10A(iii) of the Valuation Rules do not apply where job-worked finished goods are sold to or returned and consumed by the principal manufacturer. The tribunal found the appellant did not captively consume the goods nor were they consumed on its behalf by the principal, so valuation under Rule 8/10A(iii) was inappropriate. The duty demands based on those rules were set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>